这一篇是防守和篮板 DEFENSE 1.失分 Allowed Allowed Allowed │ Fast Break │ Points │ Defensive │ Points │ Points │ in Paint │ Efficiency ───┼──────┼──────┼──────┼────── Mavericks│96.1 (10th)│13.8 (16th)│41.7 (19th)│ 102.2 (10th) ───┼──────┼──────┼──────┼────── Blazers │94.7 (6th) │11.3 (3rd) │39.9 (10th)│ 103.3 (13th) ───┴──────┴──────┴──────┴────── 2.被出手命中 FG Made │ FG Attempts│ FG % │ Allowed │ Allowed │ Allowed │ ───┼──────┼──────┼──────┼ Mavericks│36.6 (12th)│81.1 (15th)│45.1% (8th)│ ───┼──────┼──────┼──────┼ Blazers │35.3 (7th) │75.6 (1st) │46.7% (20th)│ ───┴──────┴──────┴──────┴ 3.被三分出手命中 3PT Made │ 3PT Attempt 3PT % │ │ Allowed │ Allowed │ Allowed │ ───┼──────┼──────┼──────┼ Mavericks│6.2 (11th) │18.1 (17th)│34.3% (8th)│ ───┼──────┼──────┼──────┼ Blazers │6.4 (15th) │17.6 (13th)│36.6% (22nd)│ ───┴──────┴──────┴──────┴ 4.被罚球出手命中 Free Throws│ Eff. FG% │ │ Att Allowed│ Allowed │ ───┼──────┼──────┼ Mavericks│ 22.4 (5th)│48.9% (9th)│ ───┼──────┼──────┼ Blazers │ 22.9 (6th)│50.9% (21st)│ ───┴──────┴──────┴ The top of this chart shows some good news for the Blazers. They appear to hit the Mavericks at crucial points: not allowing many overall points, not allowing fast breaks, being able to throttle an already-anemic paint attack for Dallas, not allowing that many shots, period. The bad news comes at the bottom of the chart and it's significant. For all the Blazers control the pace and limit opportunities, they still give up good percentages overall, ranking 20th or below in the league in Field Goal Percentage Allowed, Three Point Percentage Allowed, and thus Effective Field Goal Percentage Allowed. Containing Dallas on the break may not be a problem. Containing them in the halfcourt could be. If the Blazers can't cover Dallas' threes the Mavs will break Portland's backs with them, not to mention spreading the court so far that nothing else will be coverable either. This is not a team against whom you can shut down the middle and call it good. 从这里可以看出几个阿拓的好消息。平均失分及被快攻分数极低，刚好可以压制小牛 已经很贫乏的Paint Point，不让他们出手太多。 但较下方的表就可以看出阿拓有着很大的问题。即使是非常慢节奏且让对手出手数减 少，各个数值的被命中率仍然偏高，只有排到联盟20名。 所以是否能限制小牛的快攻不是太大的问题，能否限制他们的半场进攻才是重点。 小牛有着联盟极佳的命中率，所以如果阿拓无法压制小牛的三分球，那更遑论其他部 份了，不能只是想要压低他们的中距离。 REBOUND 1. Off. RB │ │ Def. RB │ │ /Games │ Off. RB % │ /Games │ Def. RB %y ───┼──────┼──────┼──────┼────── Mavericks│ 9.6 (28th)│24.2% (25th)│31.8 (7th) │74.7% (10th) ───┼──────┼──────┼──────┼────── Blazers │ 12.1 (5th)│29.4% (4th) │27.1 (29th) │71.9% (25th) ───┴──────┴──────┴──────┴────── 2. Off. RB / │ Off. RB % │Def. RB / │Def. RB % │Game Allowed│ Allowed │Game Allowed│Allowed ───┼──────┼──────┼──────┼────── Mavericks│10.8 (15th)│25.3% (10th)│29.9 (12th) │75.8% (25th) ───┼──────┼──────┼──────┼────── Blazers │10.6 (12th)│28.1% (25th)│29.0 (3rd) │70.6% (4th) ───┴──────┴──────┴──────┴────── Dallas doesn't bother too much with offensive rebounding. They have a couple of good O-rebounders in Tyson Chandler and Shawn Marion but in general they speak with their made shots, not putbacks. If you see the Mavs grabbing tons of offensive boards you know something is going really wrong for the Blazers. Either that or they're trying to make bank off of Portland's shaky defensive rebounding by sending extra men to the glass, figuring the Blazers are a low risk to fast break. If that happens Portland should show them the NEW Blazers, turning on the afterburners and teaching them to get back. On the other hand the Mavericks are pretty good defensive rebounders. That could inhibit a couple of the Blazers' best offensive tricks: getting offensive rebound putbacks and/or extra possessions. One of the main issues for Portland will be maintaining credibility on the offensive glass while simultaneously keeping the Mavs from fast breaking. 小牛的进攻篮板并没有很好，他们有很好的进攻篮板者，像拳王或是香妹，但他们 通常是自投自抢，并不是跟进。 所以当你看到小牛抓了很多进攻篮板时，就可以 知道阿拓出了很大的问题。 且小牛可能会看在阿拓的低快攻率，而多让人去抢进 攻篮板。这时阿拓应该就得有所应对让他们知道得回防。 小牛如想压制阿拓，就是得多跟进抢进攻篮板，增加进攻的次数。而阿拓则是得维 持高效的进攻篮板率，并同时防止小牛的快攻。 --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 125.227.196.114 ※ 编辑: JerrydBatum 来自: 125.227.195.194 (04/16 11:48) ※ mike200293:转录至看板 Mavericks 04/16 12:56