作者Iverigma (5.3% We have No.1!)
看板BLAZERS
标题It's time for due diligence
时间Wed May 30 14:45:11 2007
http://www.portlandtribune.com/sports/story.php?story_id=118038535471843600
Portland Tribune 的文章 by Kerry Eggers
重点是最後一段 有提到一点点 Pritchard 的内心想法:
While meeting with reporters last week, Pritchard unveiled a bit of his
thought process when he said: “What you’re after is low risk, high return.
One of the guys is a higher risk, higher return, where the other is a little
lower risk and maybe not as much return. Our job is to always try to get the
highest-return player at the lowest risk we can.”
Pritchard wouldn't confirm it, but I’m assuming he considers Durant the
high-risk/high-return player, Oden the lower-risk player with perhaps not
quite as much upside. Then Pritchard was asked if he’s inclined to take
risks or surer things.
“Normally, I like the higher risk,” the Portland GM answered. “I’m a
high-risk person. Sometimes to get to the championship level, you have to
take big risks.”
Pritchard says he wouldn’t read anything into that comment, but it makes you
wonder.
Pritchard 说这两个一个风险比较高 报酬也比较高 一个风险比较低 报酬也比较低
记者的解读是:风险高的是Durant 风险低的是Oden 然後他问 Pritchard 会怎麽选
Pritchard 说 通常他会选高风险的 要打造一支总冠军球队
你必须要愿意承担比较高的风险
我觉得 Kerry Egger 的解读错的离谱
Durant 是个以新鲜人之姿在 NCAA 拿下 25ppg 以及全美最佳球员的人
怎麽看都会是风险较低的那人
不管 Egger 怎麽乱讲 Pritchard 这段话的确是指向了 Greg Oden
(希望真的是这样!)
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 71.117.233.42
1F:推 ammon:唔...可是好像一般的解读会和Egger接近点吧.. 05/30 14:52
2F:推 freeway125:同意楼上 感觉选ODEN应该风险较低 05/30 15:10
3F:推 Iverigma:可是Durant比较NBA-ready 明年立即有不错的贡献 so风险低 05/30 15:24
4F:推 illuvive:Durant的投射能力已经是NBA Ready... 05/30 16:19
5F:→ illuvive:Oden的upside比较高... 05/30 16:19
6F:推 Rostow:我也觉得Kerry Eggers解读错了 05/30 16:27
7F:推 tahikuro:NCAA最佳球队跟好的NBA球员完全2回事吧 05/30 18:32
8F:→ tahikuro:杜兰或许只是路易斯加强版 最多是诺威斯基等级吧~~ 05/30 18:32
9F:→ tahikuro:欧搬却是欧尼尔等高 还是有差吧 05/30 18:33