※ 引述《changyg (Bob)》之铭言： : Chelsea thoughts: Disappointed but not surprised : by GilbertoSilver : Guunerblog http://gunnerblog.com/?p=2576 : ＊＊＊＊＊这篇心得是 GilbertoSilver 撰写的＊＊＊＊＊ : A couple of seasons back, I characterised Arsenal - Chelsea games of recent : years as being comparable to this video clip: : 连续两个赛季以来, 我想 Arsenal vs Chelsea 的赛事可以比做以下的影片节录： : Capoeira vs Boxing (巴西武术 vs 拳击) : http://youtu.be/2g5t0s_Fn9s : (有暗讽 枪手 缺少关键一击，却总是在华丽球风大作文章(￣□￣|||)a) : What’s disappointing, I suppose, is how little that has changed. There was : even a predictability about the identity of the man delivering the knockout : blow: one Didier Drogba. : 我想，最失望的是，连扳回劣势的机会都没有。大家都有预感，认为会挥出 KO 重击的人 : 就是 Didier Drogba。 : Arsene Wenger, among other pundits, has suggested that Arsenal had an “ : outstanding game”. And yet there’s nothing unfortunate about our defeat. : This has happened too many times to be merely ‘unlucky’. Yes, we had : plenty of possession, but Chelsea probably knew it would be that way. They : knew if they sat deep, defended tight and narrow, that they could win the : match by being better in both penalty areas. Their centre-backs just about : had the measure of Marouane Chamakh, whilst we have never been, and probably : will never be, able to cope with the threat of Drogba, who now has 13 in 13 : against us. : Arsene Wenger 仍在许多的评论家之中，仍指出 Arsenal 踢了一场“杰出的比赛”。我 : 们输的比赛其实无关运气，反倒是有太多机会而不该用“不幸”来概括之。是的，我们有 : 较高的控球权，Chelsea 也认定我们会如此。他们只要深撤後防，紧盯球员并局限传球路 : 径，接着就靠较佳的锋线球员和後卫在两边禁区的优势赢下比赛即可。他们的中後卫只要 : 搞定 Chamakh 即可，而我们未曾，或者该说根本就不能搞定 Drogba 的威胁，一个至今 : 和我们对上 13 次的前锋。 : There is a lot of talk about us needing to take our chances. The finger of : blame is pointed at Laurent Koscielny, who failed to head home our most : presentable chance in the game’s opening moments. It was a poor miss, but : in isolation it didn’t represent the difference between the two teams. It’ : s not as if taking the lead in the game would somehow have prevented the : defensive sloppiness that allowed Chelsea not only to score twice but miss : more enticing opportunities. The gap could have been wider: Nicolas Anelka : slotted wide when scoring seemed simpler, and Fabianski twice saved from : one-on-one situations. : 接着，我们来谈谈所需要的是把握机会。最令人发指的便是：Laurent Koscielny，居然 : 在开局之刻最有机会的进球给它放枪。虽然浪费了那记进球，还未能明显地显出两队的差 : 异。就算领先一颗进球，也改变不了後防的凌乱让 Chelsea 不只进了两球，还送我们好 : 几次的放枪大礼。渐渐地差异愈来愈大：Nicolas Anelka 在第一记进球时由边路插上助 : 攻，即使这进球看起来很普通；接着 Fabianski 还救了两次单刀的情形。 : Yes, Koscielny should have scored, but I’m not going to blame a centre-back : for the ‘nil’ next to our name. What Arsenal need to do is make their : keep-ball strategy more efficient. Arsene is reportedly obsessed by stats, : and has sat in press conferences before defending defeats on the grounds of : our possession percentage. It means nothing, however, if it’s not converted : in to goals. A better team - a team like Chelsea - can let the other side : have the ball in the knowledge that they can go from winning it back to : scoring a goal in a matter of seconds. You don’t need a twenty pass move : when you can score with three. : 没错，Koscielny 应该进球的，但我接下来不会批评一个中後卫只因为"零"在队名里面 : (Arsenal 意即兵工厂、军火库，理应名符其实地进球，但作者故意调侃，把"nil"原意为 : 零放在队名里，即 Arsenil ，酸球队不会把握进球)。Arsenal 所需要的是，让控球策略 : 更有效率一点。Arsene 似乎为数据给着魔了，於是在记者会以控球比率来掩饰输球的事 : 实。但，控球再好，不能促成进球得分就是没有意义的。好的球队，就像 Chelsea，可以 : 让敌队一直控球，以为接下来就能够进球并赢回比赛。我要强调的是，只要能两三下的传 : 球便可得分，就不要在那里弄个二、三十次的传球。 : The same applies to set pieces too. If you’re a team with a lot of approach : play down the flanks, it is inevitable you will win a lot of corners. So : work on them. Create varied and dangerous routines. Yesterday, Arsenal had : ten corners. Only one provided any serious threat. : 同样在定位球也一样。若是球队常以两翼进攻，无疑地会拿到多次的角球机会。我要说， : 好好地加强两翼进攻，创造多样且具威胁的路径吧。昨天 Arsenal 就有十次的角球机会 : ，哪怕是只有一次(只要应用上述原则，)都能带给对方不小的威胁。 : This general inefficiency is why I’m a declared fan of Andrey Arshavin. : Yes, he gives the ball away more than any other player in our side, but he’ : s also, in the absence of the much-missed Cesc Fabregas, the most productive : in the final third. Yesterday, he produced two stinging efforts which : brought the best out of Petr Cech, from nothing. : 因着球队欠缺效率的通病之故，使得我成为 Andrey Arshavin 的头号粉丝。没错，枪手 : 中他常常掉球，但却也是，在我们最想念的 Cesc Fabregas 缺席之下，最有效率的第三 : 名球员。昨天，他制造两次进球的威胁让无所事事的 Petr Cech 不得不认真起来。 : Of course you can only use those kind of rapier counter-attacks if you can : defend. The Arsenal of 97/98 had the likes of Adams and Keown to hold the : fort whilst Nicolas Anelka sprung the offside trap to clinical effect. The : Invincibles had a back four including Sol Campbell in his prime and protected : by Vieira and Gilberto, two masters of their trade. This side does not have : a good enough defence to play in that way. We have to control the game using : keep-ball and create chances against tight, packed defences. Against almost : every side in the Premier League, that’s good enough. But not Chelsea. : 当然，你可以使用更快速的防守反击，只要你有足够的防守能力。97/98 的 Arsenal 有 : Adams 和 Keown 把守着最後防线，即使 Nicolas Anelka 穿越了越位陷阱也未必有机会 : 得分。当时的“无敌後防”由四名後卫组成，其中有一位是年轻的 Sol Campbell，而且 : 还有着大师级的後腰：Vieira 和 Gilberto。现在的阵容防御能力不足以像当年那样可以 : 踢防守反击。我们得藉由持球权来掌控比赛，并创造机会来突破对方紧缩的防御阵型。对 : 英超大部分的球队是可行的，但 Chelsea 例外。 : There’s no shame in losing this game. When you go away to the Champions, : there’s a significant chance you will get beat. This result is only a : problem in the context of others. Had we beaten West Brom, we’d be just : four points off the top as opposed to seven, and table would make much : prettier reading. : 输了这场没有什麽可耻的。当你要远征欧冠时，会有更多的机会被击败。这次赛果只是另 : 一种情境的困扰。当我们败给 West Brom 时，距榜首仅是 4分之差，现在却变成 7分之差 : ，积分榜也更显得一目了然。 : Already, just seven games in to the season, there’s little margin for error. : Crucially, we need to start beating the bigger teams. If we are to provide : a serious threat in the league this season, I’d suggest we will have to beat : both United and Chelsea - and possibly City - at the Emirates. : 虽说才不过是开季的前七场比赛而已，但不该容许有犯错的余地。更残酷的是，我们还得 : 击败更强的球队。若我们还想夺冠的话，我认为我们必须在主场击败 ManUtd 和 Chelsea : ，甚至 ManCity。 : International breaks always get me down. Going in to one on the back of two : defeats is particularly depressing. Happy Monday this ain’t. : 另外，国际比赛总是令我失望。两场输球的赛事更叫人沮丧。即使是忧郁星期一，还是祝 : 大家星期一快乐。 : ＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊＊ : 看了视频以後， : http://www.soccerclips.net/videos/chelsea-v-arsenal-motd-highlights-20101 : 才深觉得 Arsenal 尚有很大的进步空间。 : 只要碰到输球， : 不外乎那几个老调重弹的议题： : 伤病问题、(光是休养球员就能组成明星枪手队 XD) : 门将问题、(被进得莫名奇妙) : 後防问题、(当前的後防居然是今夏才买来赶上工的?!) : 中场问题、(少了F4，常常会找不到核心组织) : 前锋问题、(很幸运我们有强壮又健康的C29、有效率但体力有限的A23) : 还有，每年都会碰到的： : 30岁以上，一年一签(有找工作经验的，都不会想当短期约聘人员，宁可做久一点的正职) : 但还是那句话： : 只有真正的枪迷，无论成绩好坏，痴心不改！ : (我太喜欢这句话啦 (￣▽￣＃)﹏﹏) : Goal! Goal! Arsenal! : We r the Champions ! 这篇说得很好 将战术重点都说出来 众观全场比赛 总体而言,个人认为表现不过不失,胜负只是结果,过程却看到大家的并劲 当中最大的缺点有 1,法比有一次严重的出击失误,是高空球,好险球落在禁区队友脚下,但比赛中段开 始回稳,下半场後段更救了二次单刀,罚球太突然,非他之过... 2,开场5分钟内已有2次具威胁性的射门机会,没进球十分可惜 3,LK在防守上仍有进步空间,大赛显得成熟,再多吸些经验,後防大将之位指日子可待 4,LK与死鬼默契还不足够,有些集中力不够,特别是死鬼,两次致命失误,有时更是无压 力下犯错,是集中力不够的明显状况,还有,他盘球的基本功好像没有很好... 5,换人上也有疑问,N8下半场机乎失纵,应该换他离场,而不是体力充足的W19,输第二 球就是因为N8的失误造成LK的犯规. 6,这一场的原地反枪做得很好,但体力消费很大,SONG被换下後,中门大开... 7,阿沙这场表现还可以,持球後单干次数较多,D2不论是跟N8,阿沙或恰恰都没有很 有效的前插配合,常看到他带球到对方禁区边就停下来回传,不如多试几次边路或中 路ONE TWO. 8,恰恰的支点做得不够好,无成功二传,背身拿球也常失败,更不说转身盘带了,但枪高 空球仍有少许优势,有一球明显的在禁区被绊倒,应是点球,但没吹. -- --

※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 180.94.180.171