作者flyingdog (角落的花样年华)
看板Arsenal
标题[新闻]Fiszman:枪手不会有富爸爸 &我们也不是吝啬鬼
时间Tue May 27 15:51:24 2008
Gunners won't welcome big spenders
by Tom Adams, 27 May 2008
http://tinyurl.com/4pvu7n
(setanta)
Arsenal director Danny Fiszman has pledged that the North London club will
never go down the route pursued by rivals Chelsea and rely on a wealthy
benefactor, with natural and sustainable growth the preferred option at
Emirates Stadium.
枪手董事Fiszman表示阿森纳将不会追寻切尔西走上仰赖一名有钱资助者的道路
In a season when the club saw Mathieu Flamini lured away by Milan and
Alexander Hleb reportedly offered big money to move to Inter, there have been
suggestions that Arsene Wenger’s renowned frugality and the club’s strict
wage structure could be hindering their chances of competing for major
trophies.
The spectre of a takeover at Arsenal has been looming for well over a year
and Russian billionaire Alisher Usmanov overtook Fiszman as the club’s
leading shareholder in February when talking his stake in the club to 24.2
percent.
Wenger has memorably described Chelsea’s policy of plunging the club into
debt and relying on the personal funds of Roman Abramovich as ‘financial
doping’, and Fiszman appears ready to resist any attempts from Usmanov to
tread a similar path.
"We don't believe in the benefactor model," Fiszman told Arsenal TV.
"我们不相信有钱资助者的模式"Fiszman告诉阿森纳电视
"It is not a question of a one-time infusion of cash to buy player x or
player y. You actually then have salaries that are connected to the players.
"问题不只在於一时之间挹注资金去买某选手X或某某选手Y,事实上还有球员薪资的问题
要解决"
"What if they don't work out? Do you go and buy another two or three players?
Is there any end to it?
"如果这种模式不成功怎麽办?你就去再打包另外两个或三个选手?资金挹注何时尽?"
"So I think everybody, including Chelsea, knows there are limits. Chelsea
were not big spenders last summer certainly - they got our old player
Steven Sidwell on a free transfer.
"我认为即便是切尔西,他们也知道这是有极限的,切尔西在去年夏季并不是真正地豪气在
花钱,他们甚至以自由转会方式得到前枪手球员Sidwell "
"We believe in the end the self-sustaining model is the right one, the one we
have adopted and will continue adopting."
"我们认为俱乐部自给自足的财务模式才是正确的模式,也是我们目前为止所采用并且将
会坚持下去的"
On the departure of Flamini to Milan on a free transfer, Fiszman insisted
that Arsenal’s wage structure is competitive in The Premier League and
that they were unwilling to break that in order to keep the France
international at the club.
"We made a substantial offer to Mathieu,” Fiszman added. “It was
considerable and in line with our wage structure but he chose to go
elsewhere.
"我们给马修一份相当优渥的合约,那已经很可观,并且符合我们的薪资结构,但是他选择
去别的地方"
"We wish him luck, thank him for what he has done for the club and wish him
all the best.
"我们祝福他,也感谢他在此作的贡献"
"If you look at our total wage costs you will see they are virtually the same
as Manchester United and substantially more than Liverpool.
"如果你检视我们的薪资成本,你会发现我们跟曼联几乎差不多,还实质上高过於利物浦"
"Of course we are all a little less than Chelsea who are in a world of
their own. But compared to Manchester United and Liverpool we are good
payers.
"当然这几支球会都不能跟切尔西--这支他们自己一个世界的球队相比,但是相比於曼
联跟利物浦我们不能算是吝啬的资方"
"We believe it is a team sport and we do well but we don't want the disparity
between the top and bottom earner being too big. It takes 11 people on the
pitch to deliver."
"我们相信足球是团队运动,你永远需要十一个球员站在场上,所以我们不希望薪资金字塔
顶端与底层的球员有着太大的差距"
---
虽然偶尔也会羡慕起别人
但基於想一辈子看枪手的比赛的愿望
我非常同意我们继续自给自足
---
啊我们的好消席咧??
※ 编辑: flyingdog 来自: 210.69.124.32 (05/27 16:01)
1F:→ berch:应该是吝啬的资方吧:PP 05/27 16:07
※ 编辑: flyingdog 来自: 210.69.124.32 (05/27 17:20)
2F:→ flyingdog:版主明察..已经更正哈哈.. 05/27 17:21