作者tunababy (相信你自己,真的....)
看板Angels
标题Re: [情报] 红袜裁判有多贱?
时间Sat Sep 19 04:24:46 2009
其实昨天另一则新闻.....
也很机车...
http://www.latimes.com/sports/la-sp-angels-fuentes18-2009sep18,0,7327485.story
就是在说瞎和Fuentes呛了那两句话後....
裁判组要调查他们的谈话并威胁可能要对他们两个人罚款.....
很鸟...
至於那个红袜裁判本身的说词则是如下.....
"I saw the strike zone," Reed said of the pitch to Green, referring to the
telestrator box used on television replays. "That said it was a strike -- it
was a pitch I thought was borderline. The catcher did a nice job of bringing
it up, and that was a telling blow. If a catcher moves his glove, it's to
improve the pitch.
"I called a [strike] earlier in the game that I thought was low, and I said,
'I'm not going to let that happen again.' I wish they were all waist-high.
They'd be a lot easier to judge."
修正好球带我没什麽意见....
不过这段话配合下面的图...
我只想问,整场天使至少同一颗球判了五次....
结果最後一局红袜打击才会想到要修正?
太扯了吧?
※ 引述《tunababy (相信你自己,真的....)》之铭言：
: OC整理了图出来...
: http://0rz.tw/TWMBP
: http://0rz.tw/xCbSc
: OC难得让我觉得报导内容大胜LAtimes...
: Latimes今天还在搞那种各打50大板的游戏......
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 149.142.103.104
1F：推 neofatty:你有在上班吗 09/19 04:30
2F：推 TripleC:其实想想，应该每场赛後都用机器来review裁判的每一球判决 09/19 09:36
3F：→ TripleC:要是太不consistent的裁判就可以下放了... 09/19 09:37
4F：推 cherubim:主场变形好球带?! 09/19 14:23
5F：推 mjhsieh:粉味球场被人用原子弹炸掉是最好了 09/20 17:56
6F：→ AlexRodPOWER:你们支持天使的都是矮子吗? 10/18 19:39