作者plasmon (promising)
看板AfterPhD
标题Re: [转录][情报] 阿同伯酸云端：我们需要莱特希尔 …
时间Sun Apr 18 09:05:48 2010
※ 引述《Lindemann (工作真难找)》之铭言：
: 恕在这麽多优秀博士和博士後讨论这个问题,希望鞭小力一点啦
: 我是有点觉得李家同教授这个论证是非常"不合逻辑的",无论是从历史来看或是常理来看
: 首先Lighthill教授专长是流体力学,数学物理,即使他非常聪明,但人总是渺小的
: 我不知道Lighthill教授他是怎麽去证明这件事情,或是他在资工也是非常的专精?
: 但是任何非资讯这领域的专家应该无法对整个资讯界和外界做一个公正的评价吧
: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Lighthill
It is easy to find the Lighthill report and related information here:
http://www.chilton-computing.org.uk/inf/literature/reports
/lighthill_report/overview.htm
After reading it, it might help to find how he could reach the pessimistic
conclusion.
The future is notoriously difficult to predict, however, sometime we are
forced to do it for limit of resource. It does not really matter. Scientific
progress is often walking on the trails of previous mistakes.
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 58.114.222.65
1F：推 ggg12345:那个网页有一个网址附有当年公开讨论的电视录影. 04/18 11:00
2F：推 ggg12345:借转至 soft_job , 若有问题请通告就删. 04/18 14:16