作者linmiou (小蝶)
看板R001210XX
标题Fw: [情报] 读书会资讯
时间Wed Sep 19 08:15:23 2012
※ [本文转录自 R011210XX 看板 #1GLpW_Jh ]
作者: diony7 (七) 看板: R011210XX
标题: [情报] 读书会资讯
时间: Mon Sep 17 22:48:28 2012
大家好，我是俐绮。应版主之命将读书会的资讯也PO在PTT班版，
内容是与FB社团一样的，若有问题者仍欢迎指教。
目前几个读书会的进度：
1.文学理论与文学研究方法读书会
报名人数目前有十多人（含外系，但不含大学部），待柯老师回应指定篇章後就会发
mail告知大家筹备会的时间，再於会中讨论出以後读书会的时间地点。我们班有留给我
email的有兰祺和两只鸟，如果还有意愿想加入的（或旁听的）请私讯留mail给我，以便
我到时寄筹备会通知。
2.汉学英文读书会
人数目前...二人，本学期共讨论七个议题（俟後），并已分配好导读者（Ｂ：
黄阿慢；Ｅ：王剑魂），二周聚会一次，时间暂定为周二5、6节，地点暂定在博雅馆四楼
的学习开放空间，若有兴趣参加或是旁听的，可以找我。
3.GRE读书会
未免负担太重，暂定下学期再举行。
以上。
--
汉学英文读书会议题：
英文汉学中的问题与争论
Controversies and Debates in Anglophonic Sinology
9/25中国有「metaphor」吗？
B Michelle Yeh, “Metaphor and Bi: Western and Chinese Poetics,” Comparative
Literature 39:3 (1987), pp. 237-54.
E (83dc) Pauline Yu, “Metaphor and Chinese Poetry,” Chinese Literature:
Essays, Articles, Reviews 3 (1981): 205-224.
10/09中国如何如何，谁说了算？
E Robert Bagley, review of Monumentality in Early Chinese Art and
Architecture by Wu Hung, HJAS 58:1 (1998), pp. 221-56.
B Wu Hung, “A Response to Robert Bagley’s Review of My Book,” Archives of
Asian Art 51 (1998/99), pp. 92-102.
10/23文化中国的定义问题
E Tu Wei-ming, “Cultural China: The Periphery as Center,” Daedalus: Journal
of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 120: 2 (1991).
B Paul A. Cohen, “Cultural China: Some definitional Issues,” PEW 43:3
(1993), pp. 557-63.
11/06中国中心史观：外国学者的分寸
E Michael Gasster, “Discovering China in History: Some Comments on Paul Cohen
’s Discovering History in China,” The American Asian Review 5: 2 (1987),
pp. 121-53.
B Paul A. Cohen, “Our Proper Concerns as Historians of China: A Reply to
Michael Gasster,” The American Asian Review 6:1 (1988), pp. 1-24.
11/20徘徊在文本与脉络之间的思想传记
B Ying-shih Yü, “The Intellectual World of Chiao Hung Revisited: A Review
Article,” Ming Studies 25 (1988), pp. 24-66.
E Edward T. Ch’ien, “Neither Structuralism Nor Lovejoy’s History of Ideas:
A Disidentificaion with Professor Yü Ying-shih’s Review as a Dis-course,”
Ming Studies 31 (1991), pp. 42-86.
12/04怀柔远人：望文生义抑或就事论事
B Joseph W. Esherick, “Cherishing Sources from afar,” Modern China 24:2
(1998), pp. 135-61.
E James Hevia, “Postpolemical Historiography: A Reply to James Hevia,”
Modern China 24:3 (1998), pp. 319-27. Esherick’s reply, pp. 328-32.
12/18清朝：汉化靠拢？多元典范？
B Ping-Ti Ho, “In Defense of Sinicization: a Rebuttal of Evelyn Rawski's
"Reenvisioning the Qing," JAS 57:1 (Feb 1998), pp. 123-155.
E Evelyn S. Rawski, “Presidential Address: Reenvisioning the Qing: the
Significance of the Qing Period in Chinese History,” JAS 55:4 (Nov 1996),
pp. 829-850.
--
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 111.249.183.67
1F：推 r316:推认真又热血！加油！:) 09/17 23:00
2F：推 Anglomania:谢谢阿慢～ 09/17 23:37
3F：推 SwordSpirit:好精美!! 09/18 23:52
4F：推 linmiou:好厉害～ 09/19 08:15
※ 发信站: 批踢踢实业坊(ptt.cc)
※ 转录者: linmiou (182.235.94.235), 时间: 09/19/2012 08:15:23